相关文章

交通护栏“吃人”到底是谁的错?

来源网址:http://www.jytnhl.com/

交通护栏“吃人”到底是谁的错?

交通护栏“吃人”到底是谁的错?

3月28号下午,在陕西省榆林市米脂县, 一位怀孕8个多月的孕妇在送完女儿上学之后, 因身体不适,扶着路边的交通护栏歇息时突然晕倒,致使脖子卡入交通护栏空隙中。   “当时有好多人去帮忙,但是那个交通护栏真的弄不开,想帮也帮不了!” 附近的路人尝试救助却没能成功, 等到110、120等急救人员赶来, 孕妇和肚子里的宝宝还是离开了这个世界。

发生这样的事情 到底是谁的错? 错真的在交通护栏么?

"凶手”总高130cm左右,两杆最窄只有6.5cm, 而连接两杆的铁片距离顶部有18cm高   最窄距离在正常情况下脖子是卡不进去的,但如果是在外力的情况下,如摔倒、人力强塞等情况卡进去了   没有人帮助,是很难脱困的,且短暂时间便可能休克。   有记者亲自试验发现,这种交通交通护栏的缝隙果真是“易入难出”   假如是上面两种栏杆,或许那名孕妇最多只是晕倒在地,悲剧也许就不会发生了。。。    因为这件事儿,社会各界都发出了 质疑交通护栏设计不合理、间隙太窄的声音。

不过涉事厂家表示: “不会因为偶发事件重新设计。” 可这真的是偶发事件吗?   根据媒体的梳理,就是这种一模一样的圆头交通护栏,5年来在各地至少已经造成3人死亡: 2010年11月,江苏南通一名白发老人被人发现脖子卡在交通护栏上,120赶到现场时老人已气绝身亡 2013年10月,北京中关村一女子卡脖20分钟后确诊脑死亡 就在去年,北京又发生一起类似致死事件,更不用说交通护栏卡脖致伤事件了。  对于所谓的“偶发事件”,如果我们只用一句“运气不好”糊弄过去,这对逝去的生命也太轻飘飘了!  事实上,“交通护栏夺命”事故屡屡发生,与其设计存在隐患有关 我国交通护栏主要分两大类,一类是防撞交通护栏,主要在高速公路上使用,这一块交通护栏有国家标准。另一类是隔离交通护栏,主要在车行道和人行道上使用,国家虽然对其材质有要求,但具体如何设计、规格并无统一标准。各地规范同样缺失。

由于没有统一标准,隔离交通护栏的隔离样式和规格五花八门,通常厂家销售交通护栏的规格只公布包括高度、材质、单根交通护栏的直径等数据。至于缝隙间隔规格,则是按照用户需求而定的。

Traffic barrier "eat people" in the end is who's fault?

On the afternoon of March 28, in Mizhi County, Yulin City, Shaanxi Province, a pregnant 8 months pregnant after to send my daughter to school, because the body is unwell, leaning on the side of the road traffic guardrail rest suddenly fainted, resulting in neck card into traffic guardrail voids. "At that time there were a lot of people to help, but the traffic barrier really do not open, want to help can not help!" Nearby passers-by trying to rescue but failed to succeed, wait until 110, 120 emergency personnel arrived, pregnant women and children in the stomach or left the world.

Whose fault is this to happen? Wrong really in the traffic barrier it? "

About murderer "total height 130cm, two strokes the narrowest only 6.5 cm, and the connection rod iron from the top 18cm high the narrowest distance under normal neck card does not go, but if it is under the external force, such as fall, strong human plug card into without help and is difficult to rescue and short time may shock. A reporter personally test showed that, the traffic guardrail gap really is "easily into a difficult" if it is above two railings, perhaps that pregnant women most just fainted in the tragedy might not occur the. Because of this thing, all sectors of the community have raised questions about the traffic guardrail design is not reasonable, the gap is too narrow for voice.

But someone said: "manufacturers not because of contingency redesign." Is it true incident? According to the media comb, is exactly the same as the round traffic guardrail, 5 years around has caused at least three people died: November 2010, Nantong, Jiangsu, a white haired old man was found neck stuck in traffic guardrail, 120 arrived on the scene when the old man already herring in October 2013, Beijing Zhongguancun, a woman neck 20 minutes after the diagnosis of brain death in the last year, Beijing and similar fatal incident, let alone said traffic guardrail neck injury events. For the so-called "accident", if we only use a word "bad luck" to fool the past, the passing away of life too light! In fact, "traffic guardrail deadly accidents often happen, instead of designing problems about our country traffic guardrail is divided two categories, a class is anti-collision traffic guardrail, mainly in the use of the highway, the traffic guardrail with national standards. Another kind is traffic isolation fence, mainly in the use of roadways and walkways, the state although there are requirements for the material, but specific how to design, specifications there is no uniform standard. Around the same lack of specification.

Because there is no uniform standard, isolation fence traffic isolation styles and specifications of all kinds, usually the specifications of the manufacturers sales traffic guardrail released only diameter data including height, materials, single traffic guardrail. As for the gap interval is determined in accordance with specifications, user demand.